Game Theory Pigeons

Случайная страница | ТОМ-1 | ТОМ-2 | ТОМ-3
АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатика
ИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханика
ОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторика
СоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансы
ХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

In game theory, the Nash equilibrium, named after the mathematician John Forbes Nash Jr., is the most common way to define the solution of a non-cooperative game involving two or more players. In a Nash equilibrium, each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players and no player has anything to gain by changing only. At least that is the theory! Obviously the more pigeons that are bred the better chance we have of producing that very special mutation; that has all the physical & mental features that enable it to race home quicker. This is why Europe tends to breed more champion birds than say Australia. Which two variables are common to all game theory models of aggressive contests? Contest costs and resource value Males that do not establish a territory of their own but are sometimes tolerated on a territorial male's residence in exchange for assistance in territorial defense are referred to as. In game theory, the Nash equilibrium, named after the mathematician John Forbes Nash Jr., is the most common way to define the solution of a non-cooperative game involving two or more players. In a Nash equilibrium, each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players and no player has anything to gain by changing only his own strategy.

Читайте также:
Theory

Business leaders and, indeed, people in general, differ greatly in what they are able to accomplish with given amounts of resources. Consequently, small armies led by brilliant military strategists sometimes defeat large armies commanded by unimaginative generals. Skilled poker players may be consistent winners even if, on average, they are dealt poor cards, while mediocre play­ers usually walk away from a game as losers de­spite average or better cards. And one firm may fail miserably, while an apparently similar firm prospers. Luck is sometimes a decisive factor, but even more frequently, correctly forecasting the behavior of your friends or rivals and then developing an effective strategy is the key to suc­cess or failure.

Economists who consider strategic behav­ior4 stress that (a) a single firm's actions may af­fect industrial concentration, (b) dynamic decisions (decisions made over time) are invari­ably rational, and (c) differential information shapes firm behavior and market structure.

This first point leads to the idea that, either individually or jointly, firms often pursue strate­gies to bar entry into their industry; potential competition often determines incumbent firms' current pricing and output policies. For exam­ple, banks located close to each other may unite to oppose the chartering of a new bank, citing the low interest rates they charge, lack of need for another bank, their willingness and ability to accommodate all creditworthy applicants for loans, and their service to the community.

Game theory pigeons pictures

The second point is that firms, like all eco­nomic agents, make sequential rational deci­sions over time. What you will do in a particular situation depends on what you learned from ex­perience after making decisions in similar situ­ations. Firms consider the previous reactions of their rivals when planning a business strategy. Dynamic game theory models of rational deci­sions extend the boundaries of earlier theory.

The third point recognizes that bargaining parties may have different information about po­tential transactions that often affect incentives and decisions. For example, a firm's manager may know that a huge layoff is scheduled as soon as a contract is completed but may try to keep workers from looking for other jobs through false reassurances that the firm has a pending new con­tract to be fulfilled. This type of knowledge asym­metry is common. Traditional models that treat information as free and perfect, or that assume that all transactors share the same information base, typically yield different conclusions than models that recognize asymmetric information.

The 1994 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics was awarded to John Nash, John Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten for their pio­neering work in game theory and strategic bar­gaining. 2359 digits

Pigeon Hole Theory

Дата добавления: 2015-07-10; просмотров: 196 | Нарушение авторских прав

Game Theory Pigeons Pictures

Читайте в этой же книге:Chapter Review: Key Points | Vocabulary practice: switching. | Monopoly and Technical Change | UNIT 1(25) LEXICAL MINIUMUM | Chapter Review: Key Points | Key terms – matching and translation. | ANTITRUST AND REGULATION | Vocabulary practice: switching. | Major Merger Movements | UNIT 3(27) LEXICAL MINIUMUM |

Pigeon Conspiracy Theory

< предыдущая страница| следующая страница >
Vocabulary practice: switching.|UNIT 2(26) LEXICAL MINIUMUM

Install Game Pigeon

mybiblioteka.su - 2015-2020 год. (0.005 сек.)